Developing the Planetary Intelligence Commons

Proposed Charter v0.1

1. Purpose

The Planetary Intelligence Commons exists to steward shared evidence, models, and deliberative processes that support the long-term habitability of Earth, while respecting ecological limits, community sovereignty, and democratic legitimacy.

The Commons enables better questions, better decisions, and continuous learning across nested scales—from neighborhoods and bioregions to planetary systems.


2. Scope

The Commons governs three interdependent domains:

  1. Evidence Commons
    Observations, datasets, community knowledge, monitoring protocols, and provenance metadata.
  2. Model Commons
    Forecasting models, scenario tools, causal maps, assumptions, uncertainty characterizations, and performance evaluations.
  3. Deliberation Commons
    Participatory processes, decision briefs, dispute resolution pathways, and records of reasoning behind collective choices.

3. Core Commitments

3.1 Epistemic Integrity

All published outputs must disclose:

  • primary sources and dates
  • transformations (cleaning, aggregation, AI summarization)
  • assumptions and known limitations
  • uncertainty and confidence levels
  • known incentives or conflicts
  • privacy and consent conditions

No unlabeled synthesis may circulate as “commons-validated.”

3.2 Consent and Knowledge Sovereignty

The Commons recognizes:

  • community ownership of local knowledge
  • Indigenous data sovereignty
  • revocable consent
  • restricted access tiers
  • explicit “do not publish / do not train” flags

Open does not mean extractive.

3.3 Subsidiarity and Nesting

Decisions are made at the lowest competent scale, with coordination across scales for spillover effects.
Bioregional nodes are primary; planetary coordination is integrative, not directive.

3.4 Anti-Capture and Pluralism

The Commons is structured to prevent domination by:

  • states
  • corporations or vendors
  • philanthropies
  • ideological blocs
  • technical elites

Pluralism is a robustness requirement, not an optional value.


4. Membership Classes

  • Communities & Bioregional Councils
  • Scientific & Technical Contributors
  • Civic Institutions & Agencies
  • Civil Society & NGOs
  • Funders (non-controlling)
  • Tool & Infrastructure Providers
  • Independent Auditors & Red Teams
  • Public Observers

Membership confers rights and responsibilities defined below.


5. Roles and Responsibilities

5.1 Commons Council (Stewards)

  • Sets standards and indicators
  • Approves governance changes
  • Enforces integrity and consent rules
  • Appoints auditors and ombuds

5.2 Maintainers (Operations & Data Stewards)

  • Maintain infrastructure
  • Implement standards
  • Manage access and versioning
  • Ensure security and continuity

5.3 Contributors

  • Submit data, models, analyses, or narratives
  • Comply with evidence and consent standards
  • Accept review and revision requirements

5.4 Auditors / Red Teams

  • Independently challenge high-impact claims
  • Stress-test models and assumptions
  • Detect misuse, bias, or manipulation

5.5 Ombuds / Mediators

  • Receive harm reports
  • Facilitate conflict resolution
  • Recommend corrective action or sanctions

6. Contribution and Validation Pipeline

  1. Submission
    Data, model, or claim submitted with required metadata.
  2. Integrity Screening
    Provenance, licensing, consent, and transformation checks.
  3. Peer Review
    Domain experts + affected community reviewers where relevant.
  4. Adversarial Audit
    Mandatory for policy- or finance-relevant outputs.
  5. Publication
    Versioned release with claim labels and uncertainty.
  6. Monitoring
    Post-publication error reporting and drift detection.
  7. Revision or Retraction
    Logged, transparent, and attributable.

7. Claim Labeling (Mandatory)

Every published statement must be labeled as:

  • Observational
  • Inferred (model-based)
  • Scenario (conditional)
  • Normative (value-based)
  • Recommendation
  • Speculative

This prevents the laundering of opinion or projection into fact.


8. Rights and Safeguards

  • Right to explanation and traceability
  • Right to contest and appeal
  • Right to withdraw consent
  • Protection for minority and dissenting views
  • Prohibition on pay-to-validate influence

9. Funding and Independence

Permitted funding sources:

  • public funding
  • diversified philanthropy (non-controlling)
  • membership dues (scaled)
  • paid services that do not affect validation outcomes

No funder may control standards, conclusions, or publication.


10. Amendments and Review

  • Annual governance review
  • Emergency amendment pathway
  • Supermajority requirement for core principles
  • Public change logs

II. One-Page Operating Model

How the Planetary Intelligence Commons Actually Runs

Image

Image

Image

Image

1. Flow of Intelligence (End-to-End)

Signals → Evidence → Models → Questions → Deliberation → Decisions → Outcomes → Learning

Each step has a gate, an owner, and an audit trail.


2. The Commons Engine (Human + AI)

Function Who Output
Integrity gate Integrity agent + human steward Admissible evidence
Analysis Domain agents Forecasts, scenarios
Challenge Red-team agents Failure modes
Sensemaking Community agents Value context
Deliberation Facilitator agents + councils Decision briefs
Evaluation Learning agents Performance metrics

No single actor controls more than one critical function.


3. Decision Surfaces

The Commons does not decide for communities.
It produces decision-ready artifacts:

  • trade-off maps
  • uncertainty ranges
  • distributional impacts
  • policy and finance pathways
  • “what would change our mind” criteria

Authority remains with legitimate local bodies.


4. Minimum Viable Outputs (First 90 Days)

  • Commons Charter (this document)
  • Integrity & consent standards
  • 10–20 baseline indicators
  • One bioregional pilot node
  • Public questions backlog
  • Dispute resolution process

5. What Makes This Different

  • Questions are first-class outputs
  • Uncertainty is explicit, not hidden
  • Community knowledge is governed, not mined
  • AI is separated into roles, not centralized
  • Governance is nested, not globalized

This is intelligence with legitimacy, not optimization without consent.


Recommended Next Steps (Practical)

If you agree, the logical next moves are:

  1. PIC Charter v0.1 (public PDF)
    Clean, branded, funder-ready version.
  2. Bioregional Pilot Addendum
    Applying the Charter to Genesee–Finger Lakes (or another region).
  3. Agent Charter Pack
    One page per agent: mission, inputs, outputs, failure modes.
  4. Founding Partners Brief
    A short invitation document for collaborators and funders.